<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Biblical Theological Perspective on the Ground</title>
	<atom:link href="http://historiasalutis.com/2009/05/29/a-biblical-theological-perspective-on-the-ground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://historiasalutis.com/2009/05/29/a-biblical-theological-perspective-on-the-ground/</link>
	<description>Resources about biblical theology and its relation to the theological encyclopedia.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://historiasalutis.com/2009/05/29/a-biblical-theological-perspective-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-3040</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 18:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiasalutis.com/?p=48#comment-3040</guid>
		<description>ZlrnK5 I&#039;m not easily impressed. . . but that&#039;s impressing me! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZlrnK5 I&#8217;m not easily impressed. . . but that&#8217;s impressing me! <img src='http://historiasalutis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ives</title>
		<link>http://historiasalutis.com/2009/05/29/a-biblical-theological-perspective-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiasalutis.com/?p=48#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Indeed, it is a precious thought to consider the broad sweep of redemption.  The whole creation groans for the coming regeneration, the ground included.

I fear that our understanding of &#039;heaven,&#039; that is, the future hope of the Christian, is all too commonly restricted to the disembodied, intermediate state.  Recently, I&#039;ve wondered whether our sometimes selective use of biblical terminology tends to flatten that hope, which in the end will really embrace the totality of creation.  For example, I noticed the Confession of Faith employ the language of Paul in Ephesians 5:5 to describe the future state as &quot;the inheritance&quot; of &quot;the Kingdom of Christ and of God.&quot;  Inheritance, of course, is a rich term that Paul regularly employs from the OT to refer to the future hope of the Christian.  And it&#039;s loaded with connotations to &#039;the ground.&#039; &#039;Kingdom&#039; is also a broader, encompassing term.  Do you think that part of our defect lies in a failure to employ and to meditate on the rich terminology that the Scripture uses to describe our hope?  &#039;Heaven,&#039; when cut from the warp and woof of the text, seems to turn into shorthand for St. Peter&#039;s pearly gates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, it is a precious thought to consider the broad sweep of redemption.  The whole creation groans for the coming regeneration, the ground included.</p>
<p>I fear that our understanding of &#8216;heaven,&#8217; that is, the future hope of the Christian, is all too commonly restricted to the disembodied, intermediate state.  Recently, I&#8217;ve wondered whether our sometimes selective use of biblical terminology tends to flatten that hope, which in the end will really embrace the totality of creation.  For example, I noticed the Confession of Faith employ the language of Paul in Ephesians 5:5 to describe the future state as &#8220;the inheritance&#8221; of &#8220;the Kingdom of Christ and of God.&#8221;  Inheritance, of course, is a rich term that Paul regularly employs from the OT to refer to the future hope of the Christian.  And it&#8217;s loaded with connotations to &#8216;the ground.&#8217; &#8216;Kingdom&#8217; is also a broader, encompassing term.  Do you think that part of our defect lies in a failure to employ and to meditate on the rich terminology that the Scripture uses to describe our hope?  &#8216;Heaven,&#8217; when cut from the warp and woof of the text, seems to turn into shorthand for St. Peter&#8217;s pearly gates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Biblical Theological Perspective on the Ground</title>
		<link>http://historiasalutis.com/2009/05/29/a-biblical-theological-perspective-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>A Biblical Theological Perspective on the Ground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiasalutis.com/?p=48#comment-139</guid>
		<description>[...] Here .     Biblical Studies, Biblical Theology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here .     Biblical Studies, Biblical Theology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

